Regulators Coming to their Senses About Skin-in-the-Game?

Last week, the Wall Street Journal ran an article detailing some of the latest discussions among regulators at the US Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation related to the Dodd-Frank inspired rule that would require issuers of residential mortgage-backed debt to retain 5% of the value of loans in the program. 

More commonly known as “skin-in-the-game”, this half-baked solution to abuse in the US RMBS markets may have run its course and interestingly enough, before it actually becomes fully implemented.

The reasons are fairly obvious.  Just the threat of this additional “cost of issuance”, when combined with all the other regulatory uncertainties facing mortgage originators and other MBS arrangers has been enough to shock the private mbs market into a ghost of its former self.  Now it seems that these effects are finally sinking in with US regulators.  They may now see that the cure may actually be worse than the disease. 

Earlier in the year, the regulators signaled their intentions to scrap the “20% down-payment” or “QRM” rule.  Now the suggestion is that the other component to skin-in-the-game, the 5% retention rule, may now only apply to loans that are of an “interest-only” nature. 

While they are at it, can’t they just kill the whole thing and admit that the skin-in-the-game idea was a bad one from the beginning.  For more than four years, we have been saying that the issuers of mortgage-backed securities already have a ton of skin-in-the-game.  Their business models depend on a free-flowing source of capital that can only be found in a well-oiled mortgage-backed securities marketplace. 

This will never be more true then when the GSE’s are wound down over the next few years.  Right now they are the only game in town.  It has taken the regulators a few years to take note or perhaps they needed time to build their case.  Either way, it’s time to put a stick in this rule.

About markferraris
Managing Principal Orchard Street Partners LLC

One Response to Regulators Coming to their Senses About Skin-in-the-Game?

  1. Federal regulators are proposing new risk retention rules geared toward reducing risky low mortgage lending. The ‘skin in the game” rule was articulated in the Dodd-Frank Consumer Protection Act, which mandates credit risk sharing and for mortgage-backed securities (MBS) sponsors and those of other asset classes to align their interests with investors.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: